|python3.patch||Don't consider `python` a valid python? interpreter. Just to be safe, don't even try to look it up.
Should be safe to drop the patch once python2 is not around anymore.
|Mattia Rizzolo <email@example.com>||not-needed||2020-05-07|
|skip-tests.patch||skip tests that are currently failing||not-needed||upstream|
|test-output-page.patch||partial patch from upstream to ease the next patch||no||upstream, 699da8c402e8fce05b08021d1bfff779499d711c||2022-12-18|
|fuzzy_tests.patch||[PATCH 1/2] Fuzzy bitmap comparison in CLI rendering tests
Enhance the CLI testing framework with the ability to compare raster
output (either produced by Inkscape or converted from a vector format
with ImageMagick) using the L2 distance in the image space. Each such
"fuzzy" test can set a maximum allowed percentage difference between
the two compared images. This technique is applied to four multipage
output tests, fixing the spurious failures due to subtle differences
in rasterization artifacts between platforms and library versions.
|Rafael Siejakowski <firstname.lastname@example.org>||no||2022-07-10|
|skip-test-lpe.patch||skip test 31 - test_lpe64 this fails on ard64, s390x, ppc64el||not-needed||upstream||2022-12-20|
|skip-test-8_png_check_output.patch||skip test 241 - cli_export-png-color-mode-gray-8_png_check_output this fails on arm64, s390x, ppc64el
allegedly a precision error in the gamma
|timeout-test-lpe.patch||increaste timeout for this test https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=inkscape&arch=mipsel&ver=1.2.2-1&stamp=1671553799&raw=0
In the past it took ~60 seconds, but suddenly it timeouted after 180.
Let's try increasing this.
|Mattia Rizzolo <email@example.com>||not-needed||2022-12-21|
|skip-test-librevenge.patch||skip all the librevenge comparison tests I had a quick look and it seems to me that the produced files look identical to my eye but `compare` claims they are not.
Probably this started with librevenge 0.0.5, as in december 2022 these tests were fine, to be further investigated.
|Mattia Rizzolo <firstname.lastname@example.org>||no||2023-01-10|
|skip-test-glyph-big-endian.patch||skip this test that fail on s390x, ppc64, sparc64 Here the failure is real, but let's just ignore it since it only concerns BE||Mattia Rizzolo <email@example.com>||not-needed||upstream||2023-01-10|
|skip-test-use.patch||skip test-use According to upstream, this is a false positive||Mattia Rizzolo <firstname.lastname@example.org>||not-needed||upstream||2023-01-10|