Debian Patches
Status for librtas/2.0.4-1.1
| Patch | Description | Author | Forwarded | Bugs | Origin | Last update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0001-fixes-for-Wstrict-prototypes.patch | fixes for -Wstrict-prototypes We should always specify the argument list and types. librtas_src/librtas.h:55:1: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes] 55 | int rtas_activate_firmware(); | ^~~ librtas_src/internal.h:50:1: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes] 50 | int interface_exists(); | ^~~ librtas_src/syscall_calls.c:254:5: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes] 254 | int rtas_activate_firmware() | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ librtas_src/syscall_rmo.c:309:12: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes] 309 | static int init_workarea_config() | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ librtas_src/syscall_rmo.c:388:5: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes] 388 | int interface_exists() | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ librtasevent_src/print_rtas_event.c:62:1: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes] 62 | static int (*re_print_fns[])() = { | ^~~~~~ The only thing noteworthy here is rtas_activate_firmware(), which is declared in a public header. But updating the declaration to rtas_activate_firmware(void), which matches the implementation and all known callers, should not pose any compatibility issues. |
Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com> | no | 2023-05-10 |