| Patch | Description | Author | Forwarded | Bugs | Origin | Last update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| arm.patch | bad aligned access considerations on ARM This patch is related with bug report #217221: SDLNet_(Read|Write)(16|32) assume host endianness is always LE) and the endian.patch |
Sam Hocevar <sam@zoy.org> | no | debian | 2003-09-24 | |
| endian.patch | SDLNet_(Read|Write)(16|32) assume host endianness is always LE This patch is related with bug report #212570 (bad aligned access considerations on ARM), and the arm.patch |
Sam Hocevar <sam@zoy.org> | no | debian | 2003-10-23 | |
| UDP_Bind.patch | SDLNet_UDP_Bind does not behave as described Original bug report: The comment, which is the same as in the header file, describes one behaviour. The code implements another: if channel is -1, it binds to the first channel that has not yet been bound to the maximum number of addresses. The if (binding->numbound... line should be just if ( binding->numbound) { (i.e. choose an unused channel). (Although this may break any apps using the incorrect behaviour.) . Debian changelog: * Changed comment for SDLNet_UDP_Bind to reflect implementation - Since upstream has not responded to this (and seems dead), and a fair number of packages use sdl-net, I don't want to change the behavior just for debian, only properly document the actual behavior. - (Closes: 211570) |
cph@cph.demon.co.uk | no | debian | 2003-09-18 |